Health inequities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples

Despite significant variation between and within populations, First Nations, Metis, and Inuit peoples in Canada continue to face lower levels of health and well-being relative to non-Indigenous Canadians. Using nationally representative data sets such as the First Nations Regional Health Survey and the Indigenous Peoples Survey, our research has assessed disparities within Indigenous populations and also relative to the non-Indigenous population in Canada. Some of this research has also assessed how factors that contribute to these inequities such as food insecurity, low socioeconomic status, and other social determinants of health.

Despite the stress and trauma experienced, Indigenous peoples continue to demonstrate their strength and resilience in various ways. To find out how various aspects of cultural identity and engagement can buffer against the negative effects of adversity and promote wellness, please click here.

 

To find out how our research is beginning to assess how biological factors might be involved in the transmission of effects of residential schools or the child welfare system across generations, please click here.

 

To find out how our research has been used in various ways to benefit Indigenous peoples, including by providing evidence of the continued direct and intergenerational effects of the residential school system and the child welfare system so that Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples can have a shared understanding of the legacy of colonialism in Canada, please click here.

 

To find out how we are examining the current landscape of Indigenous education curriculums in Canada and exploring best practices for educators and academics conducting Indigenous health research please click here.

Journal Articles

https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200177

Background: Indigenous people are disproportionately affected by mental health issues in Canada. We investigated factors underlying the difference in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours between non-Indigenous and Indigenous populations living off-reserve in Canada.

 

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey — Mental Health. Respondents were aged 18 years and older. We measured the variation in psychological distress (10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale scores, ranging from 10 [no distress] to 50 [severe distress]) and the prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide plan between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations and explained these differences using the Blinder–Oaxaca approach.

 

Results: The overall response rate for the survey was 68.9%, comprising 18 300 respondents (933 Indigenous and 17 367 non-Indigenous adults). We found lower mean psychological distress scores among non-Indigenous people than among Indigenous people (15.1 v. 16.1, p < 0.001) and a lower prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation (9.2% v. 16.8%, p < 0.001) and plan (2.3% v. 6.8%, p < 0.001). We found that if socioeconomic status among Indigenous people were made to be similar to that of the non-Indigenous population, the differences in mean psychological distress scores and prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide plan would have been reduced by 25.7% (women 20.8%, men 36.9%), 10.2% (women 11.2%, men 11.9%) and 5.8% (women 7.8%, men 8.1%), respectively.

 

Interpretation: Socioeconomic factors account for a considerable proportion of the variation in mental health outcomes between non-Indigenous and Indigenous populations in Canada. Improving socioeconomic status among Indigenous people through plans like income equalization may reduce the gap in mental health outcomes between the 2 populations in Canada.

 

Indigenous people around the globe have suffered from the impacts of colonization to various extents and often share similar historical and ongoing collective adversities that negatively affect well-being.1,2 Of particular concern is the disproportionate burden of mental health issues among Indigenous people.35 A growing number of studies demonstrate the extent of inequality in physical health and mental health between non-Indigenous and Indigenous populations. 610 For example, just under one-quarter of Inuit (23.5%) and First Nations adults living off-reserve (24.0%) and 1 in 5 Métis (19.6%) reported lifetime suicidal ideation, compared with just over 1 in 10 non-Indigenous adults.11 Furthermore, a recent study12 shows inequalities in mental health outcomes within Indigenous populations in Canada.

 

To assist effective policy-making based on the emerging evidence of the extent of inequalities, it is critical to understand what explains these inequalities. Recent studies12,13 highlighted the importance of social determinants of health in inequalities in health and mental health outcomes within Indigenous populations in Canada. These studies show, for example, that policies designed to address food insecurity may help reduce mental health issues among Indigenous people living off-reserve in Canada. Our study objective was to quantify the extent of, and explain various demographic, socioeconomic and geographical factors that account for, inequalities in psychological distress, suicidal ideation and suicide plans between non-Indigenous and Indigenous populations living off-reserve in Canada.

https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181374

BACKGROUND: Indigenous peoples in Canada have high rates of psychological distress and suicide. We sought to assess the socioeconomic inequalities in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours, and the factors that explain them within Indigenous peoples living off-reserve.

 

METHODS: Using the nationally representative 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey collected from Indigenous adults living off-reserve in Canada, we measured income-related inequalities in psychological distress (measured on the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale) and suicidal behaviours (suicidal ideation and suicide attempt) and identified factors contributing to these inequalities using the concentration index (C) approach.

 

RESULTS: Among 14 410 individuals representing 600 750 Indigenous adults (aged ≥ 18 yr) living off-reserve in Canada, the mean score of psychological distress was 16.1; 19.4% reported lifetime suicidal ideation and 2.2% reported a lifetime suicide attempt. Women had higher psychological distress scores (mean score 16.7 v. 15.2, p < 0.001), and prevalence of suicidal ideation (21.9% v. 16.1%, p < 0.001) and suicide attempts (2.3% v. 2.0%, p = 0.002) than men. Poorer individuals disproportionately experienced higher psychological distress (C = −0.054, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.057 to −0.050), suicidal ideation (Cn = −0.218, 95% CI −0.242 to −0.194) and suicide attempts (Cn = −0.327, 95% CI −0.391 to −0.263). Food insecurity and income, respectively, accounted for 40.2% and 13.7% of the psychological distress, 26.7% and 18.2% of the suicidal ideation and 13.4% and 7.8% of the suicide attempts concentrated among low-income Indigenous peoples.

 

INTERPRETATION: Substantial income-related inequalities in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours exist among Indigenous peoples living off-reserve in Canada. Policies designed to address major contributing factors such as food insecurity and income may help reduce these inequalities.

 

Worldwide, Indigenous populations have high rates of suicide and psychological distress, the latter characterized by psychological and physiologic symptoms of anxiety and depression.13 Suicide is a major cause of death among First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples,4 the 3 distinct Indigenous groups in Canada. Suicide rates among Indigenous peoples, when considered collectively, are 2 to 3 times higher than among non-Indigenous Canadians.5 Rates of suicide and distress vary considerably across the Indigenous groups. During the period between 1991 and 2001, the Indigenous to non-Indigenous suicide mortality rate ratio was 1.60 for Métis men, 0.85 for Métis women, 1.66 for status First Nations men and 1.86 for status First Nations women.6 Suicide rates among the Inuit, which are among the highest in the world, are up to 10 times higher than the overall rate for Canada.5,7,8 Suicide led to life expectancy losses of 4.8 years for men and 1.2 years for women in Inuit Nunangat in 1999–2003.9 Suicide rates are higher among First Nations peoples living on-reserve than among Indigenous peoples living off-reserve. 10 The rate ratios for potential years of life lost owing to suicide among status First Nation men living on- and off-reserve compared with non-Indigenous men (women) were 2.88 (3.71) and 1.11 (0.76), respectively.11 Furthermore, except for Métis men, suicidal thoughts among Indigenous peoples are more common than among non-Indigenous Canadians.12

 

Historical and ongoing experiences associated with colonization accompanied by inequities in income, employment opportunities, housing and food security, among other factors, have resulted in pervasive health problems among Indigenous peoples.4,1321 Indigenous populations have the poorest health outcomes in Canada, often similar to those of populations in developing countries.18

 

Income has been shown to be a main determinant of health among both Indigenous22 and the general Canadian populations. 23 Recent evidence points to a particularly strong income-related gradient in mental health outcomes compared with most other health outcomes.24 The role of income may be especially important given persistently lower incomes among Indigenous populations compared with non-Indigenous populations, with a gap of 25% in 2015 and little improvement since 2005.25 There is scant literature on socioeconomic inequalities in mental health within Indigenous peoples in Canada, despite considerable variations in collective histories, present-day circumstances and cultures.

 

Using data from the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, we quantified the extent of and factors accounting for income-related inequalities in psychological distress and suicidal behaviours among status First Nations, non-status First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples living off-reserve in Canada.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.011

 

Using three nationally representative Aboriginal Peoples Surveys (2001, 2006 and 2012, n = 68,040), we examined income-related inequalities in self-perceived poor/fair general health status among Indigenous adults (18+) living off-reserve in Canada. We used the relative and absolute concentration indices (RC and AC, respectively) to quantify income-related inequalities in health for men and women, within the three Indigenous populations (First Nations, Métis, and Inuit), and in different geographic regions. Moreover, we performed decomposition analysis to determine factors that explain income-related inequality in health within the Indigenous peoples living off-reserve in Canada. The prevalence of poor/fair health status among the Indigenous population living off-reserve increased from 18% in 2001 to 22% in 2012. The extent of pro-rich relative (absolute) income-related inequalities in health increased by 23% (42%) from 2001 to 2012. Income-related inequalities in health increased statistically significantly within First Nations and Métis populations as well as in Atlantic provinces, Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia and Territories. Decomposition analyses indicated that, besides income itself, occupational status and educational attainment were the most important factors contributing to the pro-rich distribution of health among Indigenous peoples living off-reserve. Growing socioeconomic inequalities in health among Indigenous peoples should warrant more attention. Policies designed to address the broader array of social determinants of health may mitigate the continuing inequalities in health among Indigenous peoples living off-reserve in Canada.

 

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00352-1

 

Indigenous people worldwide are likely to share collective experiences of being exploited, marginalised, disenfranchised from lands, and having had their cultures attacked. In several countries—including Canada, the USA, and Australia—Indigenous children were targets of abusive and violent assimilation tactics. In Canada, this tactic was based on the rationale that as children, Indigenous people would be particularly suitable for “complete transformation”. To this end, the government’s policy of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their parents to attend church-run residential schools was implemented in the mid-1800s. In addition to the trauma of being taken from their communities, these children experienced chronic neglect and many experienced various forms of abuse. More than 4000 children died, and observational nutritional studies were done to note the effects of malnutrition and starvation. These schools operated during several generations until the 1990s, and coincided with many other forms of government imposed control. On the basis of a representative sample of adults living in First Nations’ communities (the largest of Canada’s three distinct Aboriginal groups [First Nations, Métis, and Inuit]) in Canada during 2008–10, 20% reported having attended one of these residential schools, 52·5% had at least one parent who attended, and 46·2% had one or more grandparents who were survivors.

Multimedia